{"id":2367,"date":"2024-06-25T09:57:41","date_gmt":"2024-06-25T09:57:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/?p=2367"},"modified":"2025-03-18T15:44:21","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T15:44:21","slug":"fostering-african-economies-a-case-for-africa-promoting-its-owndispute-resolution-system-for-trade-and-commerce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/2024\/06\/25\/fostering-african-economies-a-case-for-africa-promoting-its-owndispute-resolution-system-for-trade-and-commerce\/","title":{"rendered":"FOSTERING AFRICAN ECONOMIES: A CASE FOR AFRICA PROMOTING ITS OWN DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM FOR TRADE AND COMMERCE"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"\"><strong>By<\/strong> : <strong>Beverley Agbakoba Onyejianya and Chukwunoyenim Okoh<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"nfd-wb-animate nfd-wb-zoom-in\">In a 2024 survey conducted by Olisa Agbakoba Legal, the International Chamber of<br>Commerce (ICC) ranked as atop alternative dispute resolution institution that<br>respondents had utilised.<sup> 1<\/sup> In a similar survey in 2018 by White & Case and Queen Mary<br>University, African respondents chose the ICC and LCIA as the top two institutions. <sup>2<\/sup> The<br>Lagos Court of Arbitration (LCA) ranked as the highest African arbitration institution,<br>although in sixth place. This shows that despite the presence of over 90 alternative<br>dispute resolution institutions in Africa, <sup>3<\/sup> over 80% of African counterparties prefer to<br>resolve their disputes primarily under the auspices of the ICC and other foreign<br>arbitration institutions. <sup>4<\/sup>This article delves into the discussion surrounding the conscious promotion of African alternative dispute resolution institutions by both African governments and users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"nfd-wb-animate nfd-wb-fade-in-right-short\">Dominance of Foreign Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in Africa.<br>In Nigeria precisely, Litigation and International Arbitration remains the preferred<br>alternative dispute resolution mechanism for commercial disputes for most parties <sup>5<\/sup> . In<br>2020, the Arbitration in Africa Survey Report recorded over 90 ADR institutions or<br>organisations operating on the continent. <sup>6<\/sup> Despite this sizable number, most disputants  still tend to favour foreign ADR institutions for resolving disputes. This preference is<br>largely due to the proven track records and substantial experience, which underlie their<br>well-established reputations. The emphasis on reputation, recognition and experience<br>effectively results in a greater weighting towards long-established foreign institutions.<br>According to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in its 2019 Dispute<br>Resolution Caseload Statistics, parties from sub-Saharan Africa accounted for<br>approximately 5 percent of all parties in its 2019 caseload, with Nigerian (19), South<br>African (13), and Mauritian (10) parties taking the lead. <sup>7<\/sup> In Investor-state Arbitrations, 9<br>percent of the combined caseload in 2023 at the International Centre for Settlement of<br>Investment Disputes (ICSID) involved disputes from Sub-Saharan Africa, with the<br>Middle East and North Africa accounting for another 9 percent of disputes. <sup>8 <\/sup>Despite the<br>emergence of numerous African arbitration institutions, some African users seem to<br>prefer resolving their commercial disputes primarily under the auspices of foreign ADR<br>institutions. As the market matures, particularly in African jurisdictions of importance<br>such as Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa, and increasingly in Francophone African<br>States, governments and ADR practitioners should advocate for these disputes to be<br>adjudicated in Africa rather than being \u2018exported\u2019 to international centres.<br>Governmental Role in Promoting Local ADR Institutions<br>Western Countries, such as the US, remain highly vested and interested in Africa. In<br>2022, the United States alone invested up to US$7 Billion across Africa, the highest<br>since 2018. 9 Asian commercial interest in the continent is also on the rise and in 2023,<br>Africa became the largest recipient of Chinese commercial investment, worth US$21.7<br>Billion.<sup> 10<\/sup> With the rise in investments between China and Africa, disputes between<br>both contracting states and continents have also risen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"nfd-wb-animate nfd-wb-fade-in-bottom\">One can posit that ADR grows in direct proportion to trade and commerce. Hence, to<br>summarise, where trade goes ADR follows. Trade is essentially commercial dealings<br>and when such trade patterns and activity increases in volume, it goes without saying<br>that the number of commercial disputes will also increase in frequency and value, as will<br>the imperative to quickly resolve them. With the expected growth in investments in<br>Africa and also in anticipation of increased inter African trade relations, thanks to<br>ACFTA. Therefore, African Governments need to take cognisance that deliberately<br>promoting alternative dispute resolution could lead to an indirect positive impact on<br>economic activity, with conference centres, hotels and local lawyers all set to benefit.<br>Asides that, a recognised arbitral centre is also a great show of \u2018soft power\u2019, helping to<br>underline broader messages about political and legal stability, and give comfort to<br>foreign investors.<br>African governments should therefore consider it a duty to actively promote local ADR<br>institutions, following the example of the Egyptian government. The Egyptian<br>government provides caseload opportunities for the Cairo Regional Centre for<br>International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) by selecting CRCICA as the institution<br>of choice in bilateral and multilateral agreements. Governments are the most frequent<br>appointers of arbitrators, as well as the most frequent instructors of counsel, and they<br>are often represented by international law firms or international ADR practitioners. If<br>African parties continue to outsource African work to foreign counterparts, local ADR<br>institutions will never reach their full potential and enjoy significant patronage. The<br>reality remains that African ADR practitioners do not get a healthy bite of the ADR pie.<br>The imbalance becomes more vivid when it is noted that European state parties do not<br>tend to instruct African counsel, and the European counsel they instruct, often do not<br>partner with African Counsel in defending European States. <sup>11 <\/sup>The African government in<br>supporting local ADR institutions must insist that only local counsel are instructed and<br>the institution of arbitration are African institutions.<br>Asides from the method mentioned above, we must not neglect the impact multilateral<br>agreements could have. The majority of newly registered cases in FY 2023 (37%)<br>invoked ICSID jurisdiction on the basis of a bilateral investment treaty (BIT). Similarly, a<br>large variety of multilateral agreements also accounted for a significant share of new<br>cases, most notably the Energy Charter Treaty (13% of cases), the North American<br>Free Trade Agreement (12% of cases), and the United States-Mexico-Canada<br>Agreement (12% of cases). Parties also instituted proceedings relying on the Dominican<br>Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement (4% of cases), the ASEAN-China<br>Investment Agreement (2% of cases), the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement (2% of  cases), and for the first time, the Mexico-Costa Rica-El Salvador-Guatemala-Honduras-<br>Nicaragua Free Trade Agreement (2% of cases). A further 10% of cases were brought<br>on the basis of contracts between a host State and investor, and 6% on domestic<br>investment laws. <sup>12<\/sup><br>CONCLUSION<br>The current state of International arbitration in Africa shows an interplay between the<br>dominance of foreign alternative dispute resolution (ADR) institutions and the seeming<br>emergence of African arbitration institutions. Despite the proliferation of ADR institutions<br>on the continent, African parties still predominantly opt for foreign ADR institutions in<br>Commercial Arbitration, Construction Arbitration and other ADR matters. However, with<br>the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA) setting the stage for enhanced<br>intra-African trade and investment, there arises a critical opportunity to promote African<br>arbitration institutions as integral components of the region\u2019s economic growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">1 Beverley Agbakoba, Cornelius Gabriel, Chukwunoyenim Okoh, \u201c Assessing the Landscape of ADR in<br>Nigeria: Equity, Inclusivity and Accessibility (OAL 2024) <https:\/\/oal.law\/assessing-the-landscape-of-adr-<br>in-nigeria-equity-inclusivity-and-accessibility\/> date accessed 24 March 2024<br>2 \u20182018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration\u2019, (White and Case 2018)<br><https:\/\/arbitration.qmul.ac.uk\/media\/arbitration\/docs\/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey\u2014The-<br>Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF> date accessed 3 April 2024<br>3 \u20182022 Year in Review: Africa\u2019 [2023] Kluwer Arbitration Blog<br><https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https:\/\/arbitrationblog.kluwerar<br>bitration.com\/2023\/02\/10\/2022-year-in-review-<br>africa\/&ved=2ahUKEwjStNTkoI2FAxVYW0EAHfSFDY8QFnoECCoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1EVGvcv1gB7nro<br>pZjIkGi7<br>> date accessed 24 March 2024<br>4 Robert Wheal, Elizabeth Oger-Gross, Tolu Obamuroh, Opeyemi Longe, \u2018Institutional arbitration in Africa:<br>Opportunities and challenges\u2019 ( White & Case LP 2020) <https:\/\/www.whitecase.com\/insight-our-<br>thinking\/institutional-arbitration-africa-opportunities-and-challenges> date accessed 24 March 2024, ibid 2<br>5 \u201c GTDT-Market Intelligence Dispute Resolution 2023 Nigeria (Lexology 2023) <https:\/\/uubo.org\/wp-<br>content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Lexology-GTDT-Market-Intelligence-Dispute-Resolution-2023-Nigeria.pdf><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">6 \u20182022 Year in Review: Africa\u2019 [2023] Kluwer Arbitration Blog<br><https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https:\/\/arbitrationblog.kluwerar<br>bitration.com\/2023\/02\/10\/2022-year-in-review-<br>africa\/&ved=2ahUKEwjStNTkoI2FAxVYW0EAHfSFDY8QFnoECCoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1EVGvcv1gB7nro<br>pZjIkGi7<br>> date accessed 24 March 2024<br>7 Ibid 4<br>8 ICSID, ICSID Releases 2023 Caseload Statistics available at <https:\/\/icsid.worldbank.org\/news-and-<br>events\/news-releases\/icsid-releases-2023-caseload-statistics> date accessed 24 March 2024<br>9 EY, Africa Attractiveness Report 2023, available at <https:\/\/www.ey.com\/en_za\/attractiveness\/21\/africa-<br>attractiveness-report-> date accessed 24 March 2024.<br>10 Jevans Nyabiage, \u2018Global green transition is re-energising China\u2019s investments in Africa after pandemic<br>slowdown\u2019(South China Moring Post 2024).<br><https:\/\/www.scmp.com\/news\/china\/diplomacy\/article\/3252032\/global-green-transition-re-energising-<br>chinas-investments-africa-after-pandemic-slowdown> accessed 24 March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">11 Adebayo Adenipekun, \u2018The Role of Governments in support of African Arbitration\u2019 (AAA 2019)<br><https:\/\/afaa.ngo\/page-18097\/7302993> 23 March 2024<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">12 Michael Ostrove, Ben Sanderson and Andrea Lapunzina Veronelli, \u2018Developments in African Arbitration\u2019<br>(DLA Piper 2018) <https:\/\/globalarbitrationreview.com\/review\/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-<br>review\/2018\/article\/developments-in-african-arbitration#endnote-001> accessed 24 march 2024<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By : Beverley Agbakoba Onyejianya and Chukwunoyenim Okoh In a 2024 survey conducted by Olisa Agbakoba Legal, the International Chamber ofCommerce (ICC) ranked as atop alternative dispute resolution institution thatrespondents had utilised. 1 In a similar survey in 2018 by White &#038; Case and Queen MaryUniversity, African respondents chose the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[179],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-weekly-law","col-lg-4 col-md-6"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.nicarb.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/blog-display.png?fit=1080%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcb80P-Cb","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2367"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2571,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367\/revisions\/2571"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.nicarb.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}